Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Real Christianity [Annotated] file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Real Christianity [Annotated] book. Happy reading Real Christianity [Annotated] Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Real Christianity [Annotated] at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Real Christianity [Annotated] Pocket Guide.
Annotated Bibliography

It is better for you to enter life crippled than to have two feet and be thrown into hell. A belief in Hell is unavoidable if one is to believe in Jesus.

Christianity and Sexuality: Annotated Bibliography

This brings about an interesting comparison. Hitler sent Jews to the concentration camps and gas chambers for no reason other than their ethnic identity. This was a temporal punishment; it sometimes lasted only a few days. God, on the other hand, is prepared to send good, well-accomplished, and generous people to a place of everlasting punishment and torture for the crime of not believing in something for which no credible evidence exists. The God of the Bible is, in effect, worse than Hitler. Related to the previous point, Christianity can be understood to endorse a spectacularly cruel and senseless outcome of how certain people are judged.

Navigation menu

All one has to assume is that Hitler, a Catholic by birth, understood the gravity of his sins and confessed them to Jesus before committing suicide. According to Christian doctrine, this simple act was sufficient for him to have all of his sins forgiven and to be welcomed into Heaven. On the other hand, the 6,, Jews that he had murdered, and who by default failed to accept Christ, were sent to Hell.

This is beyond unjust and irrational; it is unthinkable. Similarly, Ted Bundy , a confirmed murderer of over 30 young women, confessed his sins before his execution and, according to Christian doctrine, was sent directly to Heaven. This irrational and senseless result is entirely consistent with the dogma of conventional Christianity. Christians have tried to sidestep the evil deeds that God allegedly commits in the Old Testament by claiming that the New Testament overrides and replaces the Old Testament, based on the idea that Jesus supplied mankind with a new covenant.

This is somewhat understandable, but what cannot be denied is that Jesus himself was a student of the Old Testament, firmly believed in it, and warned that it was not to be ignored or discarded. If the scriptures were wrong in their portrayal of God, Jesus would have emphatically announced this fact to his followers and whoever else would listen. A partial list is shown below for effect, but one in particular deserves a focused look, 1 Samuel :.

Navigation menu

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys. Jesus did nothing to defend or denounce this scripture, and apparently it was consistent with his concept of God the Father.

The case can be made that God killed or authorized the killings of up to 25,, people. This is the God that Jesus looked up to and of whom he was allegedly an integral part.

  • Denver Journal!
  • Reading Progress;
  • Ana Karenina (Spanish Edition)!
  • PDF Real Christianity [Annotated]!

That is to say: Jesus himself was an accessory to these massacres. Therefore, Christianity cannot extract itself from these atrocities; it must own them and admit that their God is in fact a serial, genocidal, infanticidal, filicidal, and pestilential murderer. Christians believe that Jesus died for their sins and received the punishment that they would otherwise deserve.

At its root, this is unethical. It would be as if in a court of law, a murderer sentenced to death finds another person willing to die in his place, and the murderer is then set free. Christianity credits what you believe far above what you do. This idea has caused much misery and suffering over the course of the past two millennia.

The notion that what you believe can erase your bad deeds is a very attractive idea to someone who wants to take liberties with the lives and property of other people. And this is exactly what happened during the scourges of the Inquisition and other atrocities committed by Christians. How different would the world be if Christianity instead declared that your ultimate reward is based on your actions, what you do, how you conduct your life, how much you help others, etc. What if it said all of the good you do is balanced against the bad, and you would be judged based on that comparison?

Most Christians believe that people who die at a young age are given a free pass to Heaven. This is a comforting thought, but it makes for some peculiar considerations. It would seem to suggest that dying at a young age, before encountering the age of accountability, would be the best and safest way to leave Earth. This would guarantee a place in Heaven without having to take a risk of living a potentially failed life in the sight of God. Some demented parents have exploited this idea as an excuse to murder their children.

The Unique Beliefs of Japan's Clandestine Christians

Many Christians believe that life begins at conception and an entire anti-abortion industry has been built around this concept. But it presents a problem. Does a fertilized egg that fails to implant in the uterus go to Heaven? This seems a bit absurd, but it is important to consider in the context of Christian dogma. If one assumes this is not the case, then it becomes very difficult to identify when a developing fetus becomes eternal in the eyes of God.

Is it at the moment of birth, such that a baby that dies just before delivery is denied Heaven? There is no non-arbitrary way to solve this problem. Old Testament:. Old Testament History:.

LCM Research Project-Annotated Bibliography | LuMin Lutheran Campus Ministry Network { ELCA }

Old Testament Wisdom:. Major and Minor Prophets:. New Testament:. Gospels and Acts:. Pauline Epistles:. General Epistles:.

  1. Is Christianity True?.
  2. Del Rey Church: Playa Del Rey, CA > Is Christianity True?.
  3. Annotated Bibliography In Apologetics, Religious Pluralism, and new Religious Movements - 2004?
  4. Bible analysis:. Bible translations:. Biblical figures:.

    Select and Annotated Bibliography of Mutō Kazuo’s Works

    Bible woo:. Scientific foreknowledge:. Apologetics and counter-apologetics:. Existence of gods:. Belief in gods:. Science and religion:. No historical or ethnographic adaptation is ultimately unitary, so this category could in principle include almost everything. I have generally classed here books about Christianity in geographically limited areas, or works that centrally contrast different kinds of Christianity with each other across the world. The expression "scientific study of religion" rarely means that the study is particularly sientific in any very strict sense.

    Rather is suggests that the study is being carried out without reference to the religious beliefs of the investigator,who is seeking to bring to the work the same critical acumen that would be brought to any non-religious topic. Considerable effort has gone into generalizing about "religion" as an independent category of human activity, an independent institution, or even a university discipline.

    Much of this has foundered on the inabiity of any strict and concise definition of religion to include the immense range of different beliefs, practices, and institutions and still reflect the normal usage of colloquial spoken English. Arguably the need to reflect English colloquial usage in technical terms is another sign that something is not all that "scientific" about a "scientific study"!

    Although many scholars assimilate religion into cognition, belief systems, or other more general categories that seek intellectual explication in other ways, the works in this section continue the general tradition of assuming one can meaningfully charaterize "religion in general.